【摘要】Public administration is an irredeemably multidisciplinary field, which draws on theories, models, and methods from a wide range of disciplines. Much work in public administration on leadership is derivative, drawn mainly from political science and organization theory. I do not co

【摘要】 What lessons about public sector reform can be learnt from using political anthropology to study governance reform? What are the strengths and weaknesses of such an approach? I contrast the everyday working experience reported in Rhodes (2011) with the core themes of civil servic

【摘要】The phrase ‘executive governance’ refers to the merger of two discrete bodies of work, the study of executive government in political science and the study of governance in public administration. We focus on their intersection; on common ground and shared puzzles. We start with a

[摘要] What intellectual influence, if any, have British public administration scholars had on their American counterparts since World War II? In this article, the author briefl y reviews the major areas of theory and research in the British study of publication administration, further

【摘要】Over the last generation, American government has undergone a steady, but often unnoticed, transformation. Its traditional processes and institutions have become more marginal to the fundamental debates. Meanwhile, new processes and institutions-often nongovernmental ones-have bec

【摘要】More than a decade has passed since the publication of Christopher Hood’s influential piece that codified the nature of the New Public Management (NPM) (Hood 1991). At that time it seemed likely, certainly within the Anglo-American research community, that the NPM was a new paradi

【摘要】The term ’governance‘ is popular but imprecise. It has at least six uses, referring to: theminimal state; corporate governance: the new public management; ‘good governance’:socio-cybernetic systems: and self-organizing networks. I stipulate that governance refers to ’self-organizi

[摘要]：英美两个国家( Cou nt ry ) 的政治理论,都以“ 政府” ( g o v e r n m e n t ) 这个术语指国家( S t a t e ) 的正式机构及其对合法的强制性权力的垄断; 而政府的特色则在于有能力作出决定并且付诸实施。“ g o v e r n m e n t ” 一词同时也指“ 统治” ,即在民族国家层次上运作以维系公共秩序、便利集体行动的正式而制度化的过程。 附件：作为理论的治理: 五个论点

走向实践的新公共服务：行动指南与前沿探索 李德国   来源：《国家行政学院学报》，2013年第3期。      正如哈贝马斯所说，理论必须放下手里拿着解释世界的钥匙的架势，去经受不断变化的社会现实的检验。唯有如此，理论才可能给人们的行为指明方向，成为推动社会进步的“一种必要的催化要素”。［1］21世纪初，针对新公共管理运动的反思，美国学者登哈特夫妇（RobertDenhardt& Janet Denhardt）提出一套“政府不仅输送顾客服务，还输送民主”的新公共服务理论，旨在唤醒公共服务的灵魂，重现那些被轰轰烈烈的新公共管理运动所遮掩的精神。新公共服务理论

摘要：当今对公众参与的讨论似乎假定，政策制定过程中存在一扇门，决策者在里面，公众在外面。建立公众参与机制无非是把原来紧锁的门改装成虚掩的单向弹簧门，公众参与就好比公众推开了那扇门，得以登堂入室参与屋内的游戏。不过矜持的决策者却不会走出户外。毛泽东等中国革命的领导人对“参与”的理解截然不同，他们主张决策者必须走出户外，主动深入到民众中去，这就是著名的“群众路线”。 下载：不应淡忘的公共决策参与模式_群众路线